What is a ‘Business Model’, and why do Organizations sometimes Find it so Hard to Change Theirs
Rumelt (2009) posits that a business model can be portrayed as the underlying principle behind the creation, delivery, and capturing of an organization’s cultural, social, economic, and other types of value. According to Haberberg and Rieple (2008), it can also be described as various formal and informal depictions for representing major business aspects such as purpose, trading activities, operational policies and procedures, organizational system, infrastructure, and strategies inclusion.
The most important function of any business model includes articulating the assessment proposition, selection of suitable features and technologies, identification of targeted marketplace segments, value chain composition definition as well as profit latent and cost framework estimation (Froud, Sukhdev, Leaver, and William, 2006). In brief, a business model is a monetary structure or organizational design of an industry. This paradigm formulates suppositions concerning costs and revenues behavior as well as the possible competitors and customers conduct. It delineates the solution contour needed in profit earning in case there exists any profit to make.
When a business model is implemented, it describes how a business penetrates into a market. According to Haberberg and Rieple (2008), success means that business paradigms should be perceptively crafted, or technical novelty will fail to bring in commercial accomplishment for the innovative business. Generally, many business paradigms can be adjusted and utilized, although some get better adapted to the environment compared to others. It is very complicated to select, adjust, and improve business paradigms.
Earlier scholarly literature failed to give much about the significance of business paradigms. Rumelt (2009) says that significant choices of business paradigms involve targeted market fragments, monetary terms such as leasing versus selling, selection of bundled versus unbundled selling approaches, go-it-alone versus licensing versus joint ventures strategies. For example, several years ago, Xerox contemplated on renting copiers instead of selling them.
It employed this strategy because the customers first tried their products before using them afterwards. Additionally, the United States Southwest Air-line believes that its customers require reliability, low charges, and frills thus utilizing its business model called the hub-and-spoke paradigm. The model fails to connect with other associations or authorize baggage and passenger interlining. Additionally, the company sells all its tickets directly instead of using travel bureau.
Helfat et al. (2007) postulate that a business must formulate, adapt, polish, and when required, restore its business paradigms. Moreover, there are preferences on the diverse ways to capture value, which assist in determining a business design or structure. It is also very hard to possess a difficult-to-impersonate or a distinguished architecture. Companies such as Wal-Mart and Dell Incorporation have shown the value linked to their business model. Their business rivals cannot replicate those business paradigms because of their uniqueness and superiority. Eventually, both companies have constantly altered and enhanced their activities.
In the private sector, business paradigms enable organizations to meet their consumers’ demands and expectations, which may set higher monetary bar or append further demands. Some of the aspects that politically form the distinctiveness of key stakeholders and their needs include macro-economic structure, corporate governance, institutional, and regulatory systems.
Designing high-quality business paradigm can be referred to as an ‘art.’ Moreover, success chances are better if businesses a) evaluate multiple options; b) possess a profound comprehension of consumer demands; c) comprehensively assess the value sequence to comprehend different ways of delivering consumer wants in timely and cost-effective manner; d) implement a virtual or impartial efficiency perception to outsourcing judgments (Froud et al, 2006). Important instruments include marketplace study and business outlay economics.
Additionally, an organizational crisis indicates that a firm’s business paradigm has become outdated; such that the underlying industry framework has transformed dramatically, thus previous means of performing businesses do not work anymore. For example, in the 90s, IBM’s basic paradigm, which used to layer options started failing. Computing demands increased, but the firm did not have any means to provide it.
Similarly, today’s newspapers are facing a similar challenge because the Internet is grabbing their adverts and consumers (Hodgkinson and Healey, 2011). However, this has made many firms to change their business paradigms. Despite the importance of changing their current business paradigms, most firms have several challenges.
There are several reasons why organizations do not change their business models. First, designing, implementation, and validation of business paradigms are very complicated. Haberberg and Rieple (2008) posit that facets of planning or redesigning business models are readily customized and systematized. However, it is notable that many scholars have written about business plan writing…
How can a simple business writing sample change your life? At first glance there’s no way it can influence your path at all, except for taking several hours of your time. But that is actually not true! Have you ever thought that a great business writing sample can help you to find equally great educational or career opportunities? So next time you are annoyed by the fact you need to write this research again, open our blog, find useful advice or place your order to receive an expert work written by our professional authors specially for you.